Preferential Semantics using Non-smooth Preference Relations
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper studies the properties of eight semantic consequence relations defined from a Tarski-logic L and a preference relation ≺. They are equivalent to Shoham’s so-called preferential entailment for smooth model structures, but avoid certain problems of the latter in non-smooth configurations. Each of the logics can be characterized in terms of what we call multi-selection semantics. After discussing this type of semantics, we focus on some concrete proposals from the literature, checking a number of meta-theoretic properties and elaborating on their intuitive motivation. As it turns out, many of their meta-properties only hold in case ≺ is transitive. To tackle this problem, we propose slight modifications of each of the systems, showing the resulting logics to behave better at the intuitive level and in metatheoretic terms, for arbitrary ≺. keywords: preferential semantics, smoothness, transitivity, selection function
منابع مشابه
Preferential model and argumentation semantics
Although the preferential model semantics is the standard semantics for non-monotonic reasoning systems, it is not used for argumentation frameworks. For argumentation frameworks, instead, argumentation semantics are used. This paper studies the relation between the two types of semantics. Several argumentation semantics are related to additional constraints on the preference relation over stat...
متن کاملConcept Model Semantics for DL Preferential Reasoning
The preferential and rational consequence relations first studied by Lehmann and colleagues play a central role in non-monotonic reasoning, not least because they provide the foundation for the determination of the important notion of rational closure. Although they can be applied directly to a large variety of logics, these constructions suffer from the limitation that they are largely proposi...
متن کاملA Preferential Model Semantics For Default Logic
Shoham, proposed, a uniform approach to systems for nonmonotonic reasoning, which consists in considering standard logics augmented with a preference relation on the interpretations. Circumscription can easily -seen. to be a special case of this preference logic framework, but capturing default logic turned out to-be, more difficult, and is even thought to be impossible by some researchers of n...
متن کاملSemantic Preferential Subsumption
We present a general preferential semantic framework for plausible subsumption in description logics, analogous to the KLM preferential semantics for propositional entailment. We introduce the notion of ordered interpretations for description logics, and use it to define two mutually dual non-deductive subsumption relations
متن کاملReasoning without Minimality
In various frameworks for commonsense reasoning such as belief revision [Gärdenfors, 1988] and preferential semantics [Shoham, 1988], appeal is made to the principle of minimal change in order to justify systematic model elimination. Given an agent’s ultimate preference over models (worlds), this principle recommends that the most preferred, among the worlds that satisfy the evidence, be chosen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Philosophical Logic
دوره 43 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014